First, the Philippines is officially an ESL country where English is recognized as a second language. It is not only widely spoken in daily life but also functions as the medium of instruction across all levels of education. In this sense, Filipinos are native speakers of English in an academic and professional form—our universities, laws, media, and governance all operate in English.
Second, Filipino teachers are highly trained, licensed, and qualified professionals. They undergo rigorous education courses, training, and certifications to meet international standards. This is why the United States, New Zealand, and many other countries actively recruit thousands of Filipino teachers every year. If we are trusted to teach in their schools, why should our credibility suddenly be questioned in Vietnam?
Third, it is crucial to understand that language teaching is not the same as just speaking English. Teaching requires pedagogy, methodology, cultural sensitivity, classroom management, and proven experience. Hiring competent teachers should be based on verified qualifications, skill sets, and track records, not simply on what passport they hold.
Lastly, the mentality of paying Filipino teachers lower salaries must be corrected. Filipino educators invest years of hard work to earn their degrees, licenses, merits, and professional experience. They deserve respect, fair treatment, and just compensation equal to the quality they bring to the classroom.
The real issue isn't about being "native" or "non-native." It's about recognizing competence, valuing dedication, and ensuring fairness in the teaching profession.
*Reader Gideon0815 sent his comments in response to a Vietnamese reader's complaint that their child's school hired Filipino teachers for "native English" lessons.