Vietnam puts 41 on trial in massive $44M corruption scandal

By AFP   June 23, 2025 | 11:50 pm PT
Vietnam puts 41 on trial in massive $44M corruption scandal
Nguyen Van Hau, chairman of construction firm Phuc Son, stands before the Hanoi People's Court on June 24, 2025. Photo by VnExpress/Danh Lam
A sweeping corruption trial involving 41 defendants, including high-ranking state officials, opened in Vietnam on Tuesday as part of the government's widening anti-graft crackdown.

The Hanoi People's Court began proceedings against 30 former officials of northern Vinh Phuc, Phu Tho and central Quang Ngai Provinces.

Eleven others -- businesspeople and company employees -- are also accused of involvement in corruption that prosecutors say caused damage to the state worth more than VND1.164 trillion ($44.48 million).

They are accused of offences including bribery, abuse of power, and violating laws on bidding and accounting.

People stand outside fences as they wait for a trial at the Hanoi Peoples Court, June 24, 2025. Photo by Ngoc Thanh

People stand outside fences as they wait for defendants to be brought to a $44 million corruption trial at the Hanoi People's Court, June 24, 2025. Photo by VnExpress/Ngoc Thanh

Prosecutors say that between 2010 and 2024, chairman of the Phuc Son Group, Nguyen Van Hau, spent over VND132 billion ($5 million) bribing officials to win contracts in 14 multi-billion dollar infrastructure projects in the three provinces.

Hau brought suitcases of cash to the offices or private residences of the officials for the bribes, prosecutors say.

Former party chief of Vinh Phuc Province Hoang Thi Thuy Lan received the biggest bribes from Hau, totalling almost $2 million -- in suitcases weighing up to 60 kilograms.

In April, Vietnam jailed a former deputy minister of industry and trade for six years after finding him guilty of "power abuse" in a solar energy development plan.

Hoang Quoc Vuong, 62, had admitted to taking a $57,600 bribe to favor solar power plants in southern Ninh Thuan province, but his family had paid the amount back before the sentencing.

 
 
go to top