Global steel crisis: Vietnam imposes higher tarrif while U.S. leads calls to end China's excess supply

By , Bui Hong Nhung, Reuters   April 20, 2016 | 04:50 pm GMT+7
Global steel crisis: Vietnam imposes higher tarrif while U.S. leads calls to end China's excess supply
Labourers work at a construction site of a residential apartment in Hanoi, Vietnam. Photo: Nguyen Huy Kham/Reuters

As China shaked off its surplus steel abroad, Vietnam's domestic market has been inundated with shipments from the neighboring country. Vietnam is hardly alone in the face of this global steel surplus. The U.S. and seven other countries called on Tuesday for urgent action, a day after China and other major steel producers failed to agree on measures to tackle an industry crisis.

Under "steel surplus" attack

Rising shipments from China made Vietnam’s steel imports hit an all-time record high of 1.94 million tons in March, jumping 76 percent from a year before. Chinese steel imports to Vietnam in the first quarter rose 70 percent year on year to 2.9 million tons, accouting for 61 percent of Vietnam’s total imports in the period, statistics showed.

Vietnam has even turned to safeguards to protect the domestic market against the wave of steel imports from its northern neighbour.

The Ministry of Industry and Trade decided earlier last month to impose temporary tariff increases on steel imports, with a 23.3 percent duty imposed on steel billet and 14.2 percent on steel bars, effective from March 22 to October 7.

China, the world's top steel producer and exporter, is also the fifth-largest importer of steel, buying an equivalent of 13.57 million tonnes of crude steel last year. China's steel production hit a record high last month as rising prices, and profits, encouraged mills that had been shut or suspended to resume production, Reuters reports.

Urgent action 

According to Reuters, representatives of the U.S., Canada, the European Union, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, Switzerland and Turkey agreed that urgent steel industry restructuring was imperative, and must be market driven, according to a joint statement released by the U.S. Department of Commerce.

They also agreed that their governments should not provide subsidies or other support that sustain loss-making steel plants or encourage additional capacity.

In a separate statement, U.S. officials said they would continue to lobby for action on steel with trade partners.

"It is our shared goal that other economies, including China, will come to recognize the value of these actions and will join our collective effort to address the causes of the current excess capacity problem," Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker and U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said in a separate statement.

"The United States will continue to engage bilaterally and multilaterally with trading partners, including China, to take meaningful action to meet that goal."

A meeting of ministers and trade officials from over 30 countries, hosted by Belgium and the OECD on Monday, concluded only that overcapacity had to be dealt with in a swift and structural way.

Washington pointed the finger at China for the talks failure, saying Beijing needed to cut overcapacity or face possible trade action from other countries.

But Chinese officials said it was already taking sufficient steps to curb capacity, while state news said blaming China for the global steel industry crisis was a lazy excuse for protectionism that would be counter-productive.

"It is the slow recovery of the world economy that causes sluggish demand for steel products, which further leads to the overcapacity issue in the steel sector," Zhang Ji, assistant minister at China's Ministry of Commerce, told state-run Xinhua News Agency on Tuesday.

The Chinese government has taken the most concrete measures and is paying an enormous price to cut overcapacity, said Zhang.

Beijing is also aiming to boost domestic steel demand from major consumers, including the automobile and machinery sectors, and drive the use of high-value added steel structures in infrastructure, Zhang said.

The OECD says global steelmaking capacity was 2.37 billion tonnes in 2015, but declining production meant only 67.5 percent of that was used, down from 70.9 percent in 2014.

Britain in particular has felt the squeeze as its largest producer Tata Steel has announced plans to pull out of the country, threatening 15,000 jobs. Last week, more than 40,000 German steelworkers took to the streets to protest against dumping from China.

 
 
go to top